             |

Board Policy - CPE
Washington State
Board of Accountancy
Policy Number: 2000-1
Title: Continuing Professional Education and Licensing Requirements*
Effective: January 1, 2000
Revised: July 18, 2008
Approved: Edwin G. Jolicoeur, CPA, Chair
*This policy rescinds and supersedes any
previous Board policy.
Purpose:
To provide clarification and
direction on the Boards continuing professional education (CPE) rules and licensing
requirements.
I. Guidance
Regarding the Appropriate Classification of a CPE Course
Generally the Board does not
pre-approve programs as meeting the Board's CPE requirements.
However, upon receipt of a CPE course description and outline, the
Executive Director may provide informal, oral guidance regarding the
appropriate classification of a course. The Executive Director is to:
- Be conservative in her/his
guidance,
- Clearly advise the individual
that the:
- CPA, CPA-Inactive
certificateholder, or resident non-licensee firm owner is
responsible for justifying classification of CPE courses, and
- Executive Director's guidance
is not binding on the Board.
II.
CPE Credit for Voluntary Service on
the Board, the Board's Committees and Programs, Peer Review Programs, and
Other Governmental Review Programs
Individuals volunteering on the
Board, the Board's Qualifications Committee, Quality Assurance Review
(QAR) Committee, or as QAR reviewers, may qualify for up to 32 hours of
technical CPE credit for actual time spent on committee meetings and work.
Individuals volunteering as reviewers for a society of CPAs peer review
committee that discusses and approves peer review reports (for
example: Volunteer service on one of the WSCPA's two Peer Review
Report Acceptance Bodies) may qualify for up to 32 hours of technical CPE
credit for actual time spent performing peer reviews of audits, reviews,
and/or compilations. CPE credit hours claimed must be supported by a
signed statement from the sponsoring organization containing: the
volunteer's name, date earned, and number of CPE hours earned. Individuals
volunteering in similar Washington state governmental report review
programs may petition the Board's Executive Director for recognition of up
to 32 hours of technical CPE for actual time spent.
III. Acceptable Evidence Supporting Eligibility for
CPE Credit
A. General
The Board will accept original CPE
documents or copies of documents submitted by mail fax, e-mail or other
electronic means. The Board, in its discretion, may require the submission
of the original of any of these documents.
If documents and/or forms are
submitted to the Board or Board staff by mail, fax, e-mail or other
electronic means, the sender is responsible for ensuring that the Board or
Board staff receives the transmittal
In addition to the evidence
noted below, the Board may request additional documentation such as
program outlines, or statements from the participant or sponsor to
determine the validity of the CPE claimed.
B. Group Programs
- Certificate of Completion: An
original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic copy of certificate of completion for each CPE program claimed is
generally considered acceptable evidence provided the certificate
states the sponsor name, the participant’s name, title of the
program, date(s) attended, and number of CPE credit hours earned.
An original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic copy of signed statement from the sponsor containing all of the
preceding elements is also accepted. The Board, in its
discretion, may require the submission of the original of any of these
documents. For online courses see
Section III.C.
- Sponsor Summaries:
The Board accepts the Washington State Society of CPA's (WSCPA)
annual CPE summaries as acceptable documentation.
To be acceptable documentary evidence the Board must be able to rely
on the sponsor’s summaries as accurately representing the participant’s
attendance. The following criteria must be met to provide such
assurance:
- The summary statement must:
- Be generated from the actual sign-in and sign-out sheets which
recorded the actual CPE credit hours attained by each attendee
and display the attendee’s signature,
- Contain the sponsor’s name, the participant’s name, the
title and date of the program(s) attended, and the number of CPE
credit hours attained for each program,
- Identify the contact individual responsible for confirming the
accuracy of the summary, and
- Contain the statement that CPAs, CPA-Inactive
certificateholders, and resident non-licensee firm
owners are solely responsible for supporting the accuracy of the
summary listing should they undergo Board audit.
- The sponsor must provide
written confirmation to the Board of meeting the above requirements
and agree to submit to a Board audit of the sponsor’s system to
confirm the accuracy of the representations.
- If the sponsor has not met the
criteria in a. and b. above, in order for the summary statement to
be acceptable evidence the CPA, CPA-Inactive certificateholders, or
resident non-licensee firm owner
must present the original summary as evidence, and the original
summary must:
- Be signed by the sponsor attesting to the accuracy of the
summary statement and identify how to contact that individual,
and
- State the sponsor’s name, the participant’s name, the
title and date of the program(s) attended, and the number of CPE
credit hours attained for each program.
C. Self-Study Programs -
Interactive and Noninteractive
Certificate of Completion:
The original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic copy of the certificate of
completion for each self-study program claimed is generally considered
acceptable evidence provided the certificate states the participant’s
name, sponsor name, title of the program, date of completion, and number of CPE credit hours earned. The date of completion as documented
by the sponsor on the certificate of completion is the date the CPA,
CPA-Inactive, or registered non-licensee firm owner
must use for reporting purposes. For online CPE courses, a copy of
the online certificate of completion is acceptable provided it contains
all of the preceding elements. (See WAC
4-25-833[1].)
D. Accredited University or College Courses
- College courses taken for credit: The
original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic copy of the official grade report or official transcript is generally
considered acceptable evidence provided it contains the following
required information: the participant’s name, the grade earned for
the courses claimed, the university or college name, the title of the
course, the course date(s), and the semester or quarter credit hours
earned. If the official grade report or the official transcript does
not contain all the required information, the CPA, CPA-Inactive, or
registered non-licensee firm owner should also retain
registration or other documentation evidencing the required
information.
- College courses not taken for credit: An
original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic copy of a statement signed by the instructor verifying the individual's
attendance is considered acceptable evidence provided the statement
contains the following required information: the university or college
name, the title of the course, the course date(s), and the semester or
quarter credit hours of the course. If the signed statement does not
contain all the required information, the individual should also retain
registration or other documentation evidencing the required
information.
E. Instruction Credit
- Presentation Time: Sponsor-generated statement
or other document verifying the CPA, CPA-Inactive
certificateholder, or registered non-licensee owner as the instructor
or discussion leader, the title of the program, the date(s) the
program was conducted, and the length of the presentation is
considered acceptable evidence.
- Preparation Time: CPE
credit is allowed for actual preparation time up to two times the
presentation hours. An original, facsimile copy, or photo/electronic
copy of a signed summary containing the dates and hours of
preparation time compiled by the CPA, CPA-Inactive
certificateholder, or registered non-licensee owner is considered
acceptable evidence of preparation time.
IV. CPE Audit Reporting and Negotiated Settlement
Guidelines
A. Time Period To Provide Proof of Compliance:
Auditees will initially receive 60 days to submit proof of
compliance. If an auditee requires additional time to obtain
documentation, the request for an extension must be submitted in
writing, and staff may extend the response time period up to a total of
90 days (i.e., provide an additional 30 days to submit proof of
compliance).
If an auditee does not respond within the approved time period, the
Board will send the auditee a final notice letter, with a 20-day
response time, via both certified and first class mail.
B. Additional Time Period to Meet CPE
Requirements:
If the audit identifies an
auditee has insufficient CPE hours resulting from unintentional:
- Misclassification of a course,
- Use of credit for
CPE hours obtained during a preceding time period, or
- An apparent inadvertent
miscalculation of hours.
The auditee will be allowed 60 days from the identification of the
error to correct the deficiency and provide proof of compliance to the
agency.
The CPE taken to bring the auditee into compliance with CPE
requirements cannot be applied forward to the current reporting period.
C. Non-Compliance - Inability to Provide Proof
of Completion of CPE
If an auditee cannot substantiate CPE hours, the issue within the
parameters of Board Policy #2004-1,
Sanction and Penalty Guidelines.
D. Auditee does not respond to Audit
If an auditee does not respond to
the Board’s 20-day final notice letter, the issue will be treated as a
violation (assigned a case number and requiring resolution by the Board).
E. Follow-up Audit to Ensure Compliance
Individuals receiving Board approval
to carry back CPE credits to a prior reporting period may be included in
the following audit cycle for the reporting group. The purpose of the
second audit is to confirm that the auditee has not double reported the
carry back CPE credits.
- Pre-Approval of Ethics Courses
Meeting the Requirements of WAC 4-25-830
The Board is committed to ensuring all
Washington state CPAs, CPAs-Inactive, and registered non-licensee firm owners
maintain a clear understanding of the Public Accountancy Act and the Board's
rules and policies, the profession's Code of Conduct (Code), and the differences
between Washington State law and the Code.
The Board expects that as a result of
attending a Board approved CPE ethics course, participants will have an
understanding of the laws and regulations in Washington State governing
accountancy, where to access those laws and regulations, and an understanding of
the scope and nature of those laws and requirements. The Board anticipates this
requirement will strengthen compliance.
To qualify as meeting the ethics CPE
requirements of WAC 4-25-830 the course
must be approved by the Board, it must cover all of the following topics, and
the ethics CPE must substantially address only these topics:
- RCW 18.04
and WAC 4-25. The CPE must include
general level information on the Public Accountancy Act, the board's rules,
policies, and the rule making process.
- WAC
4-25-521 How can I contact the board?
- WAC
4-25-550 Do I need to notify the board if I change my address?
- WAC
4-25-551 Must I respond to inquiries from the board?
- WAC
4-25-600 Series - Ethics and Prohibited Practices. The CPE must include
detailed information on each rule and all related board policies.
- WAC
4-25-800 Series - Continuing Competency: The CPE must include
detailed information on each rule and all related board policies.
- WAC
4-25-910 What are the bases for the board to impose discipline?
- AICPA Code of Conduct: The CPE must
include general level information on the AICPA Code of Conduct.
- Variances or key differences between
Washington State law (RCW 18.04 and WAC
4-25) and the AICPA Code of Conduct.
- Other topics or information as defined
by Board policy.
For CPE courses designed to meet the
requirements of WAC 4-25-830 the Executive
Director will, upon written request from the sponsor, review course
materials and determine if the program or course meets the minimum requirements
of WAC 4-25-830. To be considered for
Board approval, course sponsors must submit the following:
- Course outlines including the
anticipated time that will be devoted to each topic.
- All course materials including
presenter handouts and guides, course objectives, participant handouts and
overheads or slideshows.
- Anticipated answers to all questions
presented as part of the course materials.
- For self-study courses (both
interactive and noninteractive), the process undertaken by the course
provider to identify the CPE credit hours assigned to the course and
"field test" documents supporting the hours assigned.
For live presentations, course sponsors
must agree to allow Board representatives to attend the course at no charge to
audit the course and materials. For on-line self-study courses, course sponsors
must agree to provide Board representatives free access to audit the course and
materials.
If the Executive Director determines a
course does not meet the Board's requirements, notice as to the deficiencies
will be provided in writing and the sponsor will have the opportunity to
re-submit the course. The sponsor is responsible for researching, preparing and
submitting corrections.
If the Executive Director deems the course
as meeting the requirements of WAC 4-25-830,
a written notice of approval will be sent to the sponsor and the approved ethics
CPE course will be posted to the agency's website along with the date the
approval became effective. Upon receipt of the written notice of approval from
the Executive Director, the program sponsor may display the following statement
on literature advertising the pre-approved program:
Approved by the Washington State
Board of Accountancy as meeting the minimum requirements of WAC 4-25-830(3)
which requires four CPE credit hours in the subject area of approved ethics
and regulation with specific application to the practice of public accounting in
Washington State.
To qualify to use this language, sponsors
are required to monitor changes in RCW 18.04, Board
rules, Board policies and the AICPA Code of
Conduct and update course materials on a timely basis.
When there are substantial changes in
Board rules, the Executive Director will notify sponsors that the changes are of
a level requiring re-approval of the ethics course and sponsors will be provided
a 3 month time period to revise and re-submit the ethics CPE course for
approval. The sponsor is responsible for researching, preparing and submitting
corrections.
The Board's approval of an ethics course
will be withdrawn if a sponsor does not meet the re-submission requirements or
if the sponsor's course re-submission does not meet the Board's
requirements. In these cases, the date that the approval is withdrawn will
be noted on the Board's website. Sponsors may at any time apply for
re-approval.
Return to
Policies
|