
Guidelines
for CPE Sponsors
Revised:
January 2005
Quick Summary of Minimum Sponsor Requirements:
- Attendee Sign-In and (if the program is 4 hours or
more) sign-out sheet noting time of departure. This document should contain the
individual's printed name and their signature.
- Certificate of Completion provided to each attendee at
the end of the program. Certificate must include: sponsor, program title, date of program,
and number of CPE hours.
- Maintain the following records for 5 years:
- Sign-In and Sign-Out Sheets
- Date of Program
- Number of CPE Hours
- Name of Instructor
- Outline of Presentation
- Program Materials
This guideline is provided as a resource for sponsors
of continuing professional education (CPE) programs development, presentation, measurement
and reporting of continuing professional education programs (CPE) for Certified Public
Accountants (CPA) in the state of Washington.
The agency actively seeks to support CPE sponsors in
providing quality CPE to Washington's CPA. As such, we welcome comments on how to improve
this guideline and its contents. (CPE Sponsor Survey)
We also suggest you keep current on revisions to this
guideline and changes in the CPE rules impacting Washington State CPAs.
General
Information Washington's CPAs are required to participate in formal CPE
that maintains or increases their professional competence. A CPA's field of
employment does not limit the need for CPE. A person performing services of a
professional nature needs to have a broad range of knowledge, skills and abilities.
Accordingly, programs contributing to the development and maintenance of non-technical
professional skills should also be recognized as acceptable CPE. Other subjects may also
be acceptable if they maintain and/or increase the CPA's competence. However,
Washington's licensed CPAs are limited in the number of non-technical CPE credit hours
they may claim each reporting period. (See WAC
4-25-830.)
While CPAs participate in a wide variety of learning
activities, CPE credit is allowed only for formal programs of learning. Even though no CPE
credit is allowed for informal learning activities (such as: attending meetings,
on-the-job training, reading professional publications, serving on committees and
attending committee meetings, participating in informal roundtables) these learning
activities are very important in attaining and maintaining professional competence, and
they are a regular part of a CPA's continuing development.
In Washington State each CPA is responsible for
meeting the CPE credit hour and supporting documentation requirements of the Washington
State Board of Accountancy. In addition, the CPA may also need to meet continuing
education requirements of the federal government, a membership association, or a firm. The
CPA must meet the highest applicable requirements.
Quality CPE program sponsors recognize sound
administration, adequate resources, competent supervision and an effective and supportive
organizational structure are key elements in the design, development, implementation and
monitoring of CPE programs. Such CPE program sponsors have an administrator charged with
ensuring their program meets professional standards for continuing education such as those
recommended in this guideline.
Qualifying
Programs The overriding consideration in determining whether a specific
program qualifies as acceptable CPE is that it be a formal program of learning
contributing directly to the individual's professional competence. Continuing education
programs will qualify if:
- An agenda or outline of the program is prepared in advance and retained. The agenda or
outline should indicate the name(s) of the instructor(s), the subject matter covered and
the date(s) and length of the program.
- The educational portion of the program is at least one CPE credit hour in length
(defined by Board rule as a 50-minute period).
- Attendance is required and will be verified. Sponsors are required to have participants
sign in for each program and, if the program is longer than four hours in length,
participants must also sign out during the last hour.
- A qualified instructor or discussion leader conducts the program. A qualified instructor
or discussion leader is anyone whose background, training, education or experience is
appropriate for leading a discussion on the subject matter at the particular program.
- Attendees are provided a certificate of completion.
Attendance at the following formal group programs will
qualify if they contribute directly to the individual's professional competence:
- Professional education and development programs of national, state and local accounting
organizations
- Technical sessions at meetings of national, state and local accounting organizations and
their chapters
- University or college courses (both credit and noncredit courses) and continuing
education courses
- Formal in-firm education programs
- Programs of other organizations (government, industrial, professional)
- Firm meetings structured as formal educational programs. Portions of such meetings
devoted to administrative and firm matters cannot be included. For example, portions
devoted to the communication and application of a professional policy or procedure may
qualify. However, portions devoted to member firm financial and operating matters would
not qualify.
- Dinner, luncheon and breakfast meetings which are structured as formal educational
programs.
Formal correspondence or other individual study
programs which require registration will qualify in the year in which the program is
completed as established by the evidence of completion provided by the
program sponsor.
Writing published books and articles will qualify in
the year in which they are published, provided they contribute directly to the
professional competence of the author. Serving as an instructor or discussion leader at
continuing education programs will also qualify to the extent it contributes to the
individual's professional competence. However, the total allowable credit from those types
of activities is limited. See WAC
4-25-831(9) and (10).
Qualifying
Subjects The Board identifies subjects qualifying for technical CPE
credit and non-technical CPE credit in WAC
4-25-831(5). Please refer to the Board rule which is comprehensive in its description.
Subjects other than those listed in WAC
4-25-831(5) may be acceptable if the applicant
can demonstrate they contribute to professional competence. It is important for CPE
sponsors to note, responsibility for demonstrating whether a particular program is
acceptable rests solely on the CPA.
Ethics
and Regulations Course
Requirement During each three-year CPE reporting period, all licensees and
CPA-Inactive certificateholders are required to complete a four hour course on
professional ethics and regulations with specific application to the practice of public accounting in
Washington state. See WAC 4-25-830(3).
Generally the Board does not pre-approve programs as meeting the Boards CPE
requirements. However, the Board acknowledges both the specificity of the ethics
and regulations requirements and its own commitment to ensuring all Washington state CPAs maintain a clear
understanding of the Public Accountancy Act and the Boards Rules.
As such, for programs designed to meet the
requirements of WAC 4-25-830(3) the
Executive Director will, upon written request from the sponsor, review course materials
and determine if the program or course meets the minimum requirements of WAC 4-25-830(3). Upon receipt of written
approval from the Executive Director, the program sponsor may display the following
statement on literature advertising the pre-approved program:
"Approved by the Washington State Board of
Accountancy as meeting the minimum requirements of WAC 4-25-830(3) which requires a
four-hour course in the subject area of professional ethics with specific application to
the practice of public accounting in Washington State."
Unless the program sponsor specifically requests
otherwise, the agency posts approved courses and links to
sponsors on this web site.
Recommended
Standards for Formal Program Development The Board offers the
following recommended standards to support CPE sponsors in the development of CPE
programs:
- The program should contribute to the professional competence of participants.
The fundamental purpose of CPE is to increase the
CPA's professional competence. A professional person is one characterized as
conforming to the technical and ethical standards of the profession. This
characterization reflects the expectation that a person holding out to perform services of
a professional quality needs to be knowledgeable within a broad range of related skills.
Thus, the concept of professional competence is to be broadly interpreted.
- The stated program objectives should specify the level of knowledge the participant
should have attained or the level of competence should be demonstrated upon completing the
program.
Program developers should clearly disclose what
level of knowledge and/or skill is expected to be mastered by completing a particular
program. Such levels may be expressed in a variety of ways, all of which should be
informative to potential participants. As an illustration, a program may be
described as having the objective of imparting technical knowledge at such levels as
basic, intermediate, advanced or overview, which might be defined as follows:
- A basic level program teaches fundamental
principles or skills to participants having no prior exposure to the subject area.
- An intermediate level program builds on a basic level
program in order to relate fundamental principles or skills to practical situations and
extend them to a broader range of applications.
- An advanced level program teaches participants to deal
with complex situations.
- An overview program enables participants to develop
perspective as to how a subject area relates to the broader aspects of accounting or
updates participants on new developments in the subject area.
- All programs should clearly identify what education and/or experience prerequisites are
necessary for enrollment.
If no prerequisite is necessary, a statement to this
effect should be made. Prerequisites should be specified in precise language so
potential participants can readily ascertain whether they qualify for the program or
whether the program is above or below their level of knowledge or skill.
- Programs should be developed by individual(s) qualified in the subject matter and in
instructional design.
Although both competencies are necessary in
developing a program, this standard is not intended to suggest any individual developer be
both technically competent and competent in instructional design.
"Instructional design" is a plan that specifies the learning objectives of the
program, the content of the program, the methods of presentation (such as case studies,
lecture, work groups, programmed instruction, use of audio or visual aids or group
participation) and the manner of evaluating whether the learning objectives were
achieved. Adequacy of technical knowledge or skill in instructional design may be
demonstrated by appropriate experience or education. The level of technical
competence and instructional design skills the developer(s) should possess will vary
depending on certain characteristics of the program, such as the number of times it will
be presented, the length of the program, the complexity of the subject matter and the
number of participants.
- Program content should be current.
A program developer must judiciously review the
course content and materials to assure they are accurate and consistent with currently
accepted standards relating to the program's subject matter. Between these reviews,
errata sheets should be issued where appropriate and obsolete materials should be deleted.
However, between the time a new pronouncement, requirement or regulation is issued and the
issuance of errata sheets or removal of obsolete materials, the instructor is responsible
for informing participants of changes. If, for example, a new accounting standard is
issued, a program will not be considered current unless the ramifications of the new
standard have been incorporated into the materials or the instructor appropriately informs
the participants of the new standard.
- Programs should be reviewed by qualified person(s) other than the preparer(s) to ensure
compliance with the above standards.
It may be impracticable to review certain
programs, such as a short lecture given only once or in-house programs. In those cases,
more reliance must be placed on the competence of the presenter.
Recommended
Standards for Formal Program Presentation
- Participants should be informed in advance of objectives, prerequisites, experience
level, content, advance preparation, teaching method(s) and recommended CPE credit.
In order for potential participants to most
effectively plan their CPE, the salient features of any program should be disclosed.
Accordingly, brochures or other announcements should be available well in advance of each
program and should contain clear statements concerning objectives, prerequisites (if any),
experience level, program content, the nature and extent of advance preparation, the
teaching method(s) to be used and the amount of credit to be given.
- Instructors should be qualified both with respect to program content and teaching
methods used.
The instructor is a key ingredient in the learning
process in any group program. Therefore, it is imperative sponsors exercise great
care in selecting qualified instructors for all group programs. A qualified instructor is
one who is capable, through background, training, education and/or experience, of
providing an environment conducive to learning. The instructor should be competent
in the subject matter and skilled in the use of the appropriate teaching method(s).
Although instructors are selected with great care, sponsors should evaluate their
performance at the conclusion of each program to determine their suitability for
continuing to serve as instructors in the future.
- Program sponsors should encourage participation only by individuals with appropriate
education and/or experience
.
The term "education and/or experience" in
the standard also implies participants will be expected to complete any advance
preparation. An essential step in encouraging advance preparation is timely
distribution of program materials. Although implementing this standard may be
difficult, sponsors should make a significant effort to comply with the spirit of the
standard by encouraging (1) enrollment only by eligible participants, (2) timely
distribution of materials and (3) completion of any advance preparation.
- The number of participants and physical facilities should be consistent with the
teaching method(s) specified.
The learning environment is affected by the number of
participants and by the quality of the physical facilities. Sponsors have an
obligation to pay serious attention to these two factors. The maximum number of
participants for a case-oriented discussion program, for example, should be considerably
less than for a lecture program. The seating arrangement is also very important.
For a discussion presentation, learning is enhanced if seating is arranged so
participants can easily see and converse with each other. If small group sessions
are an integral part of the program format, appropriate facilities should be available to
encourage communication within a small group. In effect, class size, quality of
facilities and seating arrangements are integral and important aspects of the educational
environment and should be carefully controlled.
- All programs should include some means for evaluating quality.
Evaluations should be solicited from both participants
and instructors. The objective of evaluations is to encourage sponsors to strive for
increased program effectiveness. Programs should be evaluated to determine if:
- Objectives have been met
- Prerequisites were necessary or desirable
- Facilities were satisfactory
- The instructor was effective
- Advance preparation materials were satisfactory
- The program content was timely and effective
Evaluations might take the form of pre-tests for
advance preparation, post-tests for effectiveness of the program, questionnaires completed
at the end of the program or later, oral feedback to the instructor or sponsor and so
forth. Instructors should be informed of their performance and sponsors should
systematically review the evaluation process to ensure its effectiveness.
Board Rules on CPE Program Measurement
The following highlights the rules Washington CPAs must comply with when measuring
eligibility for CPE credits:
- Credit for participating in formal group programs of learning shall be determined as
follows:
- Only class hours or the equivalent (and not student
hours devoted to preparation) will be counted.
- For qualifying university or college courses (both
graduate and undergraduate) which the professional successfully completes for credit, each
semester hour credit shall equal 15 hours of continuing professional education and each
quarter hour credit shall equal ten hours of continuing professional education.
- Continuing education credit will
be given in half-hour increments only after the first full CPE
credit hour has been earned. A minimum of fifty minutes constituting
one CPE credit hour and, after the first fifty-minute segment
has been earned, twenty-five minutes constitutes one-half hour. For
example:
-
Twenty-five minutes of continuous instruction counts as zero CPE credit
hour;
-
Fifty minutes of continuous instruction counts as one CPE credit hour; and
-
Seventy-five minutes of continuous instruction counts as one and one-half
CPE credit hours.
- Professionals who arrive late, leave before a program
is completed or otherwise miss part of a program are expected to claim credit only for the
actual time they attend the program.
- Sponsors are encouraged to monitor group programs in
order to accurately record the appropriate number of hours for participants who arrive
late or leave before a program is completed.
- The credit hours for formal correspondence or other
individual study programs recommended by the program sponsor will be granted provided the
sponsor has:
- Pretested the program to determine average completion time
- Recommended the credit be equal to one-half the average completion time
- Applicants claiming credit for completing formal correspondence or formal individual
study courses are required to obtain evidence of satisfactory completion of the course
from the program sponsor. Credit is allowed in the year in which the program is completed as
established by the evidence of completion provided by the program sponsor.
- Instructors or discussion leaders may receive CPE credit for their preparation and
presentation time if the programs increase their professional competence and qualify for
CPE credit for participants. The first time they present a program, they may receive
credit for actual preparation hours up to two times the number of presentation hours. For
example, if a program is presented for eight hours, the instructors could receive up to
twenty-four hours of credit (sixteen hours for preparation and eight hours for
presentation). For repeat presentations, instructors should receive no credit unless they
can demonstrate the program content involved was substantially changed and such change
required significant additional study or research. In addition, the maximum credit for
preparation and presentation cannot exceed 72 CPE credit hours in a three year reporting period.
Board rules
on CPE Reporting Participants in formal programs of learning
who use the title CPA or CPA-Inactive should document their CPE. Acceptable evidence of completion
should be retained for five years. Acceptable evidence of completion must include the following:
Group Programs
The original certificate of completion provided by the program sponsor (see example
Section J) for each CPE program
claimed. The certificate must state the sponsor name, title of the program, date(s)
attended, number of CPE credit hours earned, the attendee's name or
An original sponsor signed statement or summary of the CPE classes claimed. The
statement or summary must state the sponsor name, title of the program, date(s) attended,
number of CPE credit hours earned, and attendee's name.
Self-Study Programs
The original certificate of completion provided by the
program sponsor for each self-study program claimed. The certificate must state the
sponsor name, title of the program, date(s) attended, number of CPE credit hours
earned, and the attendee's name.
The date of completion as documented by the sponsor is the
date the CPA must use for reporting purposes.
Accredited University or College Courses
Credit Courses the original official grade report or official transcript which
details the grade earned for each class claimed, as well as the university or college
name, title of the course, course date(s), semester or quarter credit
hours, and the attendee's name. If the
official grade report or the official transcript does not detail all elements, appropriate
registration documentation should also be retained.
Non Credit Courses the original statement signed by the instructor verifying the
CPAs attendance as well as the university or college name, title of the course,
course date(s), and semester or quarter credit hours. Appropriate registration
documentation should be retained along with the instructors statement to meet the
requirements.
Instruction Credit
Presentation Time The original sponsor signed statement verifying the CPA as the
instructor or discussion leader, the title of the program, the date(s) the program was
conducted, and the length of the presentation.
Preparation Time CPE credit is allowed for actual preparation time up to two
times the presentation hours. Acceptable evidence of preparation time is a summary
compiled and signed by the CPA. The summary should include the dates and hours of
preparation time.
Sponsors shall ascertain course completion
certificates are issued at the completion of the program to qualifying participants only.
In order to support the reports that may be required
of participants, the sponsors shall maintain records as detailed below for a period of
five years following the date each program is presented:
- The date of the program
- The names of the instructor or discussion leader
- A listing of attendees
- Outline of the program presentation, including a copy
of the program materials
- The attendee sign-in sheet and (if the program was four hours or longer in length) the
attendee sign-out sheet showing the time the attendee signed out. This sheet should
contain both the attendee's printed name and the attendee's signature.
Recommended Course Completion Certificate |